
| |
| A
bas-relief dated to 650 BC Iraq depicts heavy loads
being transported with rollers, proving that the technique
of rolling rather than sliding is at least 2,500 years
old. Also of interest is a thrust bearing found aboard
a Roman emperor's ship salvaged from a lake near Rome.
This object, thought to have been made c. 50 AD, is
strikingly similar to the rolling bearing of today.
Judging from these artifacts, we can see that the principle
of the rolling bearing was practical "technology" in
the distant past.
When we consider that heavy goods have long been transported
over long over-land distances by man power alone - before
there were dump trucks and cranes - we know that rolling
must hold some secrets.
|
| |
| Let us consider this a little more.
When a 1000-kg object is placed on the ground, how many
kilograms of force are required to move it?
We can come up with a number of answers, such as 50
kg, 100 kg, 300 kg, and 1500 kg.
Why are there so many answers?
There are so many answers because the
required force depends upon the features of the surface
in contact with the load. The force is 300 kg if the
surface is conventional pavement, 50 to 100 kg if it
is sandy, and 1500 kg if the surface is soft. When a
force is applied to an object at rest, as in this example,
the critical applied force at the point at which the
load is just about to begin to slide is called the maximum
static frictional force. In many cases, this force is
specified even if it is only mentioned as "frictional
force."
|
| |
As shown in Fig. 3, the frictional
force F is proportional to the vertical force component
of the object and can be expressed as follows:
F
= N,
where is
a constant of proportion determined by the load and
load-bearing surfaces and is denoted the coefficient
of friction. Then, how many kilograms of force will
be required to pull an object weighing 1000 kg that
rests on rollers on the ground (Fig. 2), if the coefficient
of rolling friction is assumed to be from 0.001 to 0.003? |
| Answer:
Plugging the following values
into the above equation,
=
0.001 to 0.003
N =1000 kg
we get
F = (0.001 to 0.003) X 1000
kg = 1 to 3 kg
Therefore, the object will
move if we apply to it a force from 1 to 3 kg.
|
|
| The coefficient of friction in Fig.
1 is called the sliding coefficient of friction,
and that in Fig. 2 the rolling coefficient of
friction. Substituting a ball for the roller in the
latter case yields the same result. Here, the roller
and ball are called the rolling elements.
Normally, the sliding coefficient of friction is 10
to 20 times larger than the rolling coefficient of friction,
and the rolling friction is almost the same as the so-called
fluid contact, in which the object is buoyed
by a fluid such as oil. However, because it is difficult
to maintain this state for long, and because it is partially
a sliding metal contact, the coefficient of friction
ƒÊ is as large as 0.15 to 0.3 and fluctuates. For this
reason, the rolling coefficient of friction is the more
often used of the two coefficients.
So, since ancient times it has been known that heavy
objects can be moved with relatively little effort if
rolling elements are utilized under the load. However,
it has been but very recently, about 100 years ago,
that rolling elements such as bearings have been manufactured
and marketed.
Why weren't rolling elements developed
sooner?
For the same material, the larger the rolling element
diameter, the harder it is to break; the smaller the
diameter, the easier it is broken. This may be easier
to understand if we use the analogy of a match, a pencil,
and a log.
Accordingly, if the bearing is of wood or copper or
other material known to the ancients, to support a given
weight the rolling elements must be made larger. Thus,
the bearing becomes so large as to be impractical, almost
as large as the load itself. For this reason - lack
of suitable materials - roller technology development
was arrested.
|
 |
| (Single-Row,
Negative Deep-Groove Bearing) |
Then came steel - but only somewhat
over a century ago. Steel can be made very hard by heating
it to very high temperatures and then abruptly quenching
it. In this way, steel can be given very high crushing
strength.
Accordingly, the load strength of a large-diameter wooden
roller is possible with a very small diameter steel
roller. Steel bearings found widespread use because
the steel drastically downsized the roller and made
it easier to use.
So, it is not exaggerating to say that the real history
of the bearing began with steel.
The bearing has many advantages, as
follows, in addition to light momentum, and is used
according to its suitability to the application:
|
| (1) |
Large reduction in driving
force
The loss of driving force is
small, and heavy items are moveable by small forces
because the area supporting the load moves smoothly. |
| (2) |
Small inertia
Very large forces are required to
get heavy machinery moving. This is because the
force required to overcome inertia (starting resistance)
and get the load moving is about 3 times larger
than that required to maintain the machine in motion
once it is moving, whether friction is sliding or
rolling. In fact, the starting resistance increases
further in the case of a sliding bearing, because
the lubricant is not well distributed due to its
own weight when the machine stops, and because solid
contact or semi-fluid contact occurs.
Compared with the sliding bearing, the rolling bearing
is far smaller and requires less expenditure of
power, and so is more economical. |
| (3) |
Saves lubricants
The rolling bearing consumes a very
small amount of lubricating oil in comparison with
the sliding bearing, and it can further save expenses
because grease can be used. |
| (4) |
Small abrasion
With the sliding bearing, abrasion
cannot be avoided due to repetitive liquid and semi-liquid
friction components. In contrast, the rolling bearing
wears very little as long as foreign matter does
not get into the bearing. |
| (5) |
Low maintenance cost
As the rolling bearing does not require
daily inspection or lubrication, maintenance costs
and maintenance are reduced. |
| (6) |
Improved product quality
As the bearing's rolling motion is
inherently immune to abrasion as compared with the
sliding bearing, machinery remains accurate longer,
and thus product quality is assured. |
|
| By the way, the first bearing, invented
about 110 years ago, was a ball bearing using ball rolling
elements. And, it was only about 40 years ago that the
needle bearing, using thin, needle-shaped rolling elements,
was invented. Its inventor was Hiroshi Teramachi, founder
and Supreme Advisor of THK. |
 |
| (Needle
Bearing) |
The small and lightweight needle bearing
rapidly found widespread acceptance because it could
cope with heavy loads and high rotation speeds. It was
especially utilized in large quantities by motorbike
manufacturers such as Honda, Yamaha, and Suzuki.
Japanese motorbike manufacturers became world-famous
about 1955, and their products suddenly received widespread
attention when Honda won the Isle of Man championship.
Without a doubt, the contribution of needle bearings
to the success of these products was very large. Needle
bearings doubled engine speeds from 4000 to 8000 rpm,
boosting horsepower 70% for the same engine displacement.
The motion of moving machine parts consists
of a combination of rotational and linear motion. The
above-mentioned bearings are those for rotational motion.
In their short 100-year history, rotational motion bearings
are now so widely spread that they are used in almost
all rotational motion applications. Many bearings are
used in automobile engines, and all around us there
are many other invisible applications, such as in motors
for video recorders, in roller skates, etc. |
| However, bearings for linear motion
parts were relatively undeveloped or manufactured, though
it was understood that there were many merits in these
parts if they could be made with the rolling principle
incorporated. Of the many types of mechanisms, linear
motion parts are the most difficult to develop. Let
us consider here why this is so.
|
| If we enumerate the
conditions required for linear motion parts, the following
points are outstanding:
|

|
| (Linear
Motion System LM Guide) |
1) There are high rigidities in all
directions, and the part moves lightly.
2) While moving lightly, positioning
accuracy is easily obtained.
3) The overall cost is low.
4) Service life is long and accuracy is
maintained for long periods.
5) Maintenance is easy.
6) Linear motion parts contribute to
energy savings (economical).
7) Vertical and lateral accuracies are
easily achieved.
These are necessary conditions, and
it is extremely difficult for the linear motion part
to satisfy all the listed conditions at once. Since
almost all machines have the same requirements, these
problems have long been subjects of linear motion development
efforts. The "linear motion system" of our company was
developed to solve these problems.
|
|
Thanks to this development, performance
was largely improved for various mechatronics devices
in Japan, such as numerically-controlled machine tools,
semi-conductor manufacturing equipment, and industrial
robots. This is yet another industry of Japan that has
gained worldwide recognition.
Until recent years, industrial technology
in Japan had been supported by introducing basic technology
from Europe and America. Similarly, rotation bearings
were first developed in the configurations known today
by SKF of Sweden, a company that is still one of the
most important bearing manufacturers in the world.
However, THK has striven, since the establishment
of the company in April 1971, to develop a linear motion
sliding method based on our own unique technology. We
solved most of the difficult problems one by one, and
one and a half years later, in 1973, we succeeded in
developing a linear motion system that fully utilized
the advantages of rolling in a linear motion bearing.
We have since established a position as top manufacturer
of linear motion systems, by developing and marketing
new products to meet user needs.
Nevertheless, there remains a large undeveloped market,
not limited to Japan, because it was not long ago that
the linear motion system was developed.
As a stimulus to our goals of furthering development
of this market and continuing to lead the field as top
manufacturer of linear motion systems, we spell our
name with the following spirited words: |
| T |
for Toughness |
- |
We're the toughest
contender |
| H |
for High-Quality |
- |
We field the highest
quality product |
| K |
for Knowhow |
- |
When it comes to technology
development, |
we "knowhow" like nobody
else
|
|
In other words, we are based on the management
philosophy that "the product of the highest quality" is
manufactured with the technical development capability
to satisfy all users, and we have grown into a "tough
enterprise" together with development addressing user
needs. We pledge to always make rapid progress in these
goals. |
|